4.5 Article

Artificial maturation and larval production of the limpet Patella aspera Roding, 1798 (Patellogastropoda, Mollusca): Enhancing fertilization success of oocytes using NaOH-alkalinized seawater

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 1904-1914

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15039

关键词

activation; fertilization; gametes; limpets; maturation; pH

资金

  1. PROCiencia 2020 [M1420-01-0247-FEDER-000027]
  2. FEDER
  3. AQUAINVERT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the potential for aquaculture production of the limpet species Patella aspera through artificial maturation of oocytes using alkalinized seawater. Results show that under specific conditions, a higher larval production can be achieved by employing alkalinized baths to facilitate the maturation of oocytes.
Patella aspera is a valuable limpet species native from the Macaronesian Region, which commercial exploitation is regulated due to overfishing. Aquaculture production of the species has the potential to be a sustainable alternative to the exploitation of this natural resource. This is the first study of the larval production of P. aspera with oocytes obtained from dissected gonads and artificially matured using NaOH-alkalinized seawater. An artificial maturation experiment obtained the higher ratio of matured oocytes employing alkalinized seawater at pH 9.0 and 9.5 from 3 to 5 h. In vitro experiments combined similar artificial maturation conditions: pH 9 and 9.5 (plus pH 8 as control) during 1:30, 3:00 and 4:00 h; with three fertilization times (1:30, 3:00 and 24:00 h) to determine the combination of factors leading to higher larval production. Results show increased larval production, ranging from 50% to 75% total fertilized oocytes, using alkalinized baths at pH 9 from 3 to 4 h, followed by 24 h fertilization time at 19 +/- 1 degrees C. The present methodology ensures the production of P. aspera larvae, a mandatory step for further studies focused on the larviculture and aquaculture production of this limpet species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据