4.7 Article

Evaluation of flamelet-based combustion models for the use in a flameless burner under different operating conditions

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116190

关键词

Flameless combustion; Computational fluid dynamics; Off-design

资金

  1. Ebner Industrieofenbau GmbH
  2. Institute of Thermal Engineering, Graz University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of off-design operation on the temperature field of the flameless reaction zone using modulated controlled flameless burners. Results show that local temperature peaks and NOx emissions in the flameless reaction zone increase with decreasing thermal input.
The thermal input of a flameless burner is commonly realized by its switch on-time at a unique, optimized design point. This typical on-off regulation approach may provide temporal-inhomogeneous temperature distributions in continuous operating furnaces. An alternative way of regulation is a modulated controlled flameless burner, which deals with off-design points and reaches so a more temporal-homogeneous temperature distribution. Influences on the temperature field of the flameless reaction zone, caused by the off-design operation are investigated in this paper. This is done by experimental investigations with an aspirated thermocouple and with numerical simulations, using several flamelet-based combustion models. Additionally, Nitrogen oxide emissions were measured for each design point, which starts from 165 kW at nominal power to lower limit of 60 kW. The results suggest, that the non-premixed flamelet model is suitable for the application of flameless combustion in design and off-design. Furthermore, local temperature peaks in the flameless reactions zone increase (from about 1450 to 1530 degrees C) and the NOx emissions increase (from about 32 to 88 ppm) by decreasing the thermal input of the flameless burner at constant furnace temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据