4.7 Article

Shell-and-tube polymeric hollow fiber heat exchangers with parallel and crossed fibers

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116001

关键词

Polymeric heat exchanger; Shell-and-tube heat exchanger; Hollow fiber; Heat transfer coefficient; Structure optimization

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under OP RDE [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000753]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, shell-and-tube type polymeric hollow fibers heat exchangers (PHFHE) with different fiber configurations were studied, and results showed that the overall heat transfer coefficient of the cross-wound PHFHE was 6 times higher than that of the parallel fibers PHFHE.
In this work shell-and-tube type polymeric hollow fibers heat exchangers (PHFHE) are described and investigated. These heat exchangers utilize polymeric micmchannels with outer diameter of 0.8 mm as the heat transfer surface. Heat exchangers are made of hundreds of such fibers, which are situated in the heat exchanger shell. The main purpose of this work was to conduct a comparative study of two PHFHE: the first one had parallel hollow fibers inside the shell; the second one is a new type of PHFHE having cross-wound structure where hollow fibers were placed at an angle to the heat exchanger axis. Due to the new developed method of separation hollow fibers inside the shell - cross-wound method it was possible to create an arranged structure of hollow fibers. Experimental results has shown that the overall heat transfer coefficient for PHFHE with cross-wound hollow fibers was about 6 times higher than for PHFHE with a parallel fibers at the same average shell water flow velocity. For a shell water velocity of 0.08 m/s the overall heat transfer coefficient for cross-wound PHFHE was equal to 1170 W/m(2)K at a water temperature inside hollow fiber of 11 degrees C and a shell water temperature of 70 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据