4.7 Article

Dual-metal NiCo nanoparticles in B-doped carbon layers as efficient and durable electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 532, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147381

关键词

Dual-metal material system; Ni-Co alloy; NiCo boride; B doping graphitization structure; Oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51262027]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing of northwest normal university [SKLSP201754]
  3. Science and Technology Project [17YF1GA017, 17JR5RA082]
  4. Research Project of Higher Education of Gansu Province [2017A002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Designing and construction of efficient and robust non-noble-metal electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is a pivotal approach in water splitting process. This work developed the dual-metal material system of Ni-Co nanoparticles wrapped in B-doped carbon (Ni1Co3@BC) through simple and economical pyrolysis process for nanosheets NiCo metal-organic framework (Ni1Co3-BDC) precursor. The constitution and structure of characterization were characterized by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope, indicating the homogeneous alloy and less metal boride phase and B doped graphitization structure for Ni1Co3@BC. An optimized Ni1Co3@BC exhibited extraordinary OER performance, providing an overpotential as small as 309 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2), a low Tafel slope of 62 mV dec(-1) and excellent stability in 1.0 M KOH solution, which attributed to the synergistic effect of inner NiCo alloy, NiCo boride nanoparticles and external B doping carbon structure. The formation of B doped carbon layer not only provides additional active sites but also protects inner metal alloys. This work clearly stated the design and synthesis of desired-morphology features catalysts from controlled MOFs for energy conversation and storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据