4.7 Article

Ternary metallic CuxCo1-xPtyO/RGO catalyst with internal synergistic effect for efficient hydrolysis of ammonia-borane

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 537, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147823

关键词

Hydrogen; Ammonia borane; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; Catalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1932211, U1732110]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science Technology
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. 111 Project
  5. Users with Excellence Program of Hefei Science Center CAS [2019HSC-UE002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a CuxCo1-xPtyO/RGO catalyst composite was prepared for the hydrolysis of ammonia borane, exhibiting high catalytic activity. The metallic Pt in the catalyst was identified as the true catalytic center, while Co acted as an electron donor to form Co-Pt bonds. Cu contributed to the stability of the catalyst, and RGO as a support facilitated charge transfer and particle dispersion.
Controlled release of hydrogen from ammonia borane (AB) using efficient and low-cost catalyst is still a big problem. In this work a hybrid material of CuxCo1-xPtyO catalyst immobilized on reduced graphene oxide (CuxCo1-xPtyO/RGO) was prepared for the hydrolysis of AB, which exhibited an extra-high TOF value of 854.0 (H-2)mol/(Cat-Pt)molmin. In-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals that the metallic Pt in the catalyst is the real catalytic center in the hydrolysis reaction, while it will be a stable oxidized state of Pt in air. In the ternary metallic catalyst, Co mainly serves as an electron donor to form Co-Pt bonds and then modulate the electronic structure, while Cu can keep catalyst stable. RGO as an excellent support also plays an important role to facilitate the charge transfer and help for the particle dispersion. All the components in the ternary metallic catalyst show synergistic effect to enhance the catalytic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据