4.7 Article

MOF-derived CoFe2O4 nanorods anchored in MXene nanosheets for all pseudocapacitive flexible supercapacitors with superior energy storage

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 534, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147584

关键词

MXene; MOF; Co-Fe oxide; Flexible supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673117, 21805193, 51973118]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2019M650212]
  3. Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province [2019B010929002, 2019B010941001]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170817094628397, JCYJ20170818093832350, JCYJ2017-0818112409808, JCYJ20170818100112531, JCYJ20180507-084711069, JCYJ20180305125319991]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a MOF-derived Co-Fe oxide porous nanorod is introduced into the freestanding MXene film to produce a high-performance flexible electrode with excellent deformability and editability. The as-prepared composite film electrode demonstrates several advantages: MXene layer functions as a binder and conductive additive to coat Co-Fe oxide, which can effectively facilitate charge transfer and maintain the excellent flexibility of the film electrode. In the meantime, Co-Fe oxide can work as a spacer, thereby expanding the interlayer distance, improving the ion transmission path in the electrode. As a result, the optimal Co-Fe oxide/Ti3C2Tx composite paper manifests a remarkable volumetric capacitance of 2467.6 F cm(-3) in 1 M LiCl electrolyte. When assembled into a flexible symmetrical supercapacitor, an outstanding specific areal capacitance of 356.4 mF cm(-2) can be obtained. Meanwhile, the flexible supercapacitor demonstrates excellent cycling performance with a high capacitance retention of 88.2% after 10 000 charge/discharge cycles, as well as stable electrochemical energy storage stability after 100 cycles of mechanical bending, indicating its great application potential in future flexible and portable energy storage equipment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据