4.6 Article

A hybrid self-aligned MIS-MESFET architecture for improved diamond-based transistors

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 117, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0023662

关键词

-

资金

  1. Professor Amar G. Bose Research Grant, at the Professor J. A. del Alamo laboratories in the Microsystems Technology Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2019R1F1A1060173]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1F1A1060173] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diamond is a promising electronic semiconductor candidate that has recently attracted intense interest in the implementation of its superior physical properties in electronic devices. In particular, attention has been focused on the surface transfer doping of diamond, in which the hydrogen-terminated diamond (diamond:H) benefices of a unique conductive two-dimensional hole gas (2DHG) layer at the diamond's sub-surface upon coverage with a suitable surface acceptor. Several diamond:H transistors have been developed. However, their inherent architecture dependence on the diamond:H conductive surface sensitivity to harsh processing environments has been a major barrier to the realization of high-performance devices. Here, we report on a diamond:H transistor structure that incorporates a mutual diamond:H active channel into the hybrid model of a metal-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MESFET) and a self-aligned metal-insulator-semiconductor FET (MISFET) with a common gate connection. The resulting diamond:H hybrid transistor exhibits a beneficial symbiosis that includes the advantages of both the MISFET (a high ON current of 0.8 mu A/mu m and a low OFF current of similar to 10(-9)mu A/mu m) and MESFET (almost an ideal subthreshold swing of 67mV/dec) performance operations in the same multilayered device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据