4.5 Article

PH-model: enhancing multi-passage machine reading comprehension with passage reranking and hierarchical information

期刊

APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
卷 51, 期 8, 页码 5440-5452

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-02168-3

关键词

Multi-passage reading comprehension; Passage reranking; Hierarchical neural network; Gumbel-Softmax; Natural language processing

资金

  1. National Key R & D Program of China [2016YFB1200402-020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces the PH-Model for Chinese multi-passage MRC task, focusing on reducing noise information and extracting hierarchical information to produce more precise answers. Experimental results show that PH-Model outperforms the baseline by 18.24% and 24.17% in terms of ROUGE-L and BLEU-4 on the DuReader 2.0 dataset.
Machine reading comprehension(MRC), which employs computers to answer questions from given passages, is a popular research field. In natural language, a natural hierarchical representation can be seen: characters, words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs, and documents. Current studies have demonstrated that hierarchical information can help machines understand natural language. However, prior works focused on the overall performance of MRC tasks without considering hierarchical information. In addition, the noise problem still has not been adequately addressed, even though many researchers have adopted the technique of passage reranking. Thus, in this paper, focusing on noise information processing and the extraction of hierarchical information, we propose a model (PH-Model) with a passage reranking framework (P) and hierarchical neural network (H) for a Chinese multi-passage MRC task. PH-Model produces more precise answers by reducing noise information and extracting hierarchical information. Experimental results on the DuReader 2.0 dataset (a large scale real-world Chinese MRC dataset) show that PH-Model outperforms the ROUGE-L and BLEU-4 baseline by 18.24% and 24.17%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据