4.5 Article

GRU-based capsule network with an improved loss for personnel performance prediction

期刊

APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 4730-4743

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-02039-x

关键词

Personnel performance prediction; Capsule network; Improved loss function; Gated recurrent unit

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Program in Shaanxi Province of China [2019ZDLGY03-10]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation Projects of China [61877050]
  3. Major Issues of Basic Education in Shaanxi Province of China [ZDKT1916]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2019JZ-47]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting personnel future performance is crucial for maintaining core competitive advantages in human resource management. This paper proposes a novel method using GRU model and capsule network to predict personnel performance, along with an improved loss function. The experiments on real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in selecting high-potential talents and dealing with imbalanced data issues.
Personnel performance is a key factor to maintain core competitive advantages. Thus, predicting personnel future performance is a significant research domain in human resource management (HRM). In this paper, to improve the performance, we propose a novel method for personnel performance prediction which helps decision-makers select high-potential talents. Specifically, for modeling the personnel performance, we first devise a GRU model to learn sequential information from personnel performance data without any expertise. Then, to better cluster the features, we exploit capsule network. Finally, to precisely make predictions, we further design one strategy, i.e., an improved loss function, and embed it into the capsule network. In addition, by introducing this strategy, our proposed model can well deal with the imbalanced data problem. Extensive experiments on real-world data clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据