4.5 Article

Assessment of physical work demands of long-distance industrial gas delivery truck drivers

期刊

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103224

关键词

Long-distance truck drivers; Industrial gas delivery; Over-exertion; Physical workload; MSD

资金

  1. Mitacs Accelerate program [IT06366]
  2. Mathematics and Industrial Engineering Department of Polytechnique Montreal
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2017-05629]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that long-distance truck drivers have long working hours, excessive workload, and risks of over-exertion and physical fatigue.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the work-related physical demands of long-distance truck drivers employed by a large gas delivery company in Canada. Methods: A total of 15 truck drivers participated in a data collection that included self-reporting assessments, field observations, and direct measurements to describe daily tasks organization, postural demands, physical workload, and force exertions. Results: Truck drivers' work was characterized by long working days ranging from 9.9 to 15.1 h (mean = 11.4 h), with half (49%) of the total working time spent behind the wheel. The overall workload as measured by relative cardiac strain (18.7% RHR) was found excessive for the long term given the shift duration. Peaks of heart rate in excess of 30 beats per minute above the daily average occurred mainly while operating valves and handling heavy hoses during gas deliveries. The task of delivering gas at a client's site required a moderate work rate on average (8.3 mlO(2)/kg/min) requiring 24.4% or maximum work capacity on average. Conclusion: Based on multiple data sources, this study highlights the risks of over-exertion and of excessive physical fatigue in the truck drivers' work that are coherent with the high prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal pain in this group of workers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据