4.7 Article

Influence of tailor-made TiO2/API bentonite nanocomposite on drilling mud performance: Towards enhanced drilling operations

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2020.105862

关键词

Shale reservoirs; Nanocomposite; Drilling muds; Mud cake; Lubricity; Clay swelling inhibition; Shale swelling inhibition

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) [R.J130000.7842.4F437, R.J130000. 7842.4F551]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel tailor-made TiO2 nanoparticles-bentonite (TNBT) nanocomposite-enhanced drilling mud was tested. The drilling mud showed excellent performance; (i) lubricity was enhanced, (ii) thin and well-intact mud cakes were created, (iii) coating was provided on shale and bentonite plugs, and (iv) clay and shale swelling were mitigated, hence these features ensured a platform for sustainable oil and gas well drilling. The synthesised TNBT nano composite followed the one-third bridging rule, i.e., these nanoparticles can bridge nanopore throats in shale pellets and American Petroleum Institute (API) standard bentonite pellets. The tailor-made TNBT nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. The coefficient of friction and filtrate loss of TNBT-enhanced muds were determined with a lubricity tester, and an API filter press, respectively. Additionally, shale and clay swellings were determined with a linear swell meter. The coefficient of friction was reduced after 0.8 g of TNBT was added to 350 ml drilling mud, resulting in a 35% enhancement in mud lubricity. The new mud also drastically mitigated the swelling in shale and clay when compared to conventional mud. The swelling inhibition was attributed to an increase in the mud viscosity and improved nanopore plugging characteristics, which resulted in less water infiltration. Thus, drilling mud supplemented with the tailor-made TiO2 nanoparticles-bentonite nanocomposite showed superior characteristics and a good potential for field operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据