4.8 Article

Insight into in-situ radical and non-radical oxidative degradation of organic compounds in complex real matrix during electrooxidation with boron doped diamond electrode: A case study of oil sands process water treatment

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119366

关键词

Boron-doped diamond; Electrooxidation; Electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometry; Radical and non-radical oxidants; Oil sands process water

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Senior Industrial Research Chair (IRC) in Oil Sands Tailings Water Treatment
  2. Canada First Research Excellence Fund
  3. Suncor Energy Inc.
  4. Syncrude Canada Ltd.
  5. Imperial Oil Resources
  6. Teck Resources Limited
  7. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
  8. EPCOR Water Services
  9. Alberta Innovates
  10. Alberta Environment and Parks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radical and non-radical oxidants identification and transformation mechanisms in electrooxidation using boron doped diamond electrode (EO-BDD) have been limited to synthetic solutions with little attention given to real complex matrix. In this study, electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometry (EPR) and spectrophotometry were used to identify/quantify the radical and non-radical oxidants generated during the EO treatment of oil sands process water (OSPW). The EPR spectra confirmed the direct electrogeneration of BDD((OH)-O-center dot), SO4 center dot- and CO3 center dot- as radical oxidants from H2O, SO42- and CO32- oxidation, respectively, in both OSPW and ultra-pure water containing either SO42- or CO32-. There was also accumulation of S2O82-, C2O62- and active chlorine as non-radical oxidants from the oxidation of SO42-, CO32- and Cl-, respectively. The degradation of organic contents of the OSPW was by both radical and non-radical oxidation pathways, achieving complete degradation and mineralization of dissolved organic contents at current density >= 5 mA cm(-)(2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据