4.7 Article

Characterization of the acoustic impedance of in-situ vegetated roofs

期刊

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107514

关键词

Acoustic surface impedance; Vegetated roof; Surface roughness

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vegetated roof systems can help mitigate traffic noise by acting as absorbers. The properties of substratum and plant coverage are crucial for the acoustic absorption of vegetated roofs. Most studies on acoustic absorption are based on laboratory experiments or numerical models, with limited research focusing on in-situ measurement for impedance prediction.
Vegetated roof systems can act as absorbers to mitigate traffic noise. Various properties of vegetated roofs, such as open porosity, are important for sound absorption and scattering in urban environments. Substratum has been identified as the major contributor to the acoustic absorption of vegetated roofs. However, the coverage of the substratum by plants may have a significant effect on its acoustic absorption. Most existing studies on the determination of the acoustic absorption of vegetated roofs are based either on laboratory experiments or numerical models. So far, little research has focused on the prediction of vegetated roofs' impedance based on in-situ measurements. This research modified the existing Nordtest Method for measurements at vegetated roofs. It was modified to an extended reacting double-layer medium with a variable reference surface, surface roughness was included and the three-parameter Mild impedance model was used. Using measurements on four different in-situ green roofs, a good agreement between measured and predicted results was obtained with the modified Nordtest Method. Finally, some simplifications in the modified Nordtest Method were found to reduce the complexity of the prediction without sacrificing accuracy too much. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据