4.6 Review Book Chapter

Similarities and Dissimilarities of COVID-19 and Other Coronavirus Diseases

期刊

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-110520-023212

关键词

coronavirus infections; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; immunopathogenesis; innate immune response; virus-host interaction; prevention; treatment strategies

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972660, 31900135]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030313472]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three deadly zoonotic coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, have emerged in humans in less than two decades, leading to severe respiratory diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a crisis in global health care and socio-economic development, highlighting the constantly evolving nature of coronaviruses. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms and host immune responses is crucial in developing effective strategies for prevention and treatment.
In less than two decades, three deadly zoonotic coronaviruses, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2, have emerged in humans, causing SARS, MERS, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), respectively. The current COVID-19 pandemic poses an unprecedented crisis in health care and social and economic development. It reinforces the cruel fact that CoVs are constantly evolving, possessing the genetic malleability to become highly pathogenic in humans. In this review, we start with an overview of CoV diseases and the molecular virology of CoVs, focusing on similarities and differences between SARS-CoV-2 and its highly pathogenic as well as low-pathogenic counterparts. We then discuss mechanisms underlying pathogenesis and virus-host interactions of SARS-CoV-2 and other CoVs, emphasizing the host immune response. Finally, we summarize strategies adopted for the prevention and treatment of CoV diseases and discuss approaches to develop effective antivirals and vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据