4.7 Article

Surgical Outcomes, Technical Performance, and Surgery Burden of Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer A Prospective Study

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 276, 期 5, 页码 E434-E443

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004764

关键词

gastric cancer; laparoscopic total gastrectomy; robotic total gastrectomy; surgery burden; surgical outcomes; technical performance

类别

资金

  1. Joint Funds for the innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province [2017Y9011, 2017Y9004, 2018Y9041]
  2. Construction Project of the Fujian Province Minimally invasive Medical Center [[2017]171]
  3. Second Batch of Special Support Funds for Fujian Province Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents [2016B013]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201908350095]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802312, 82002462]
  6. General Project of the Sailing Fund of Fujian Medical University [2019QH1052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the short-term outcomes of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in gastric cancer patients. The results showed that the RTG group had lower intraoperative blood loss, retrieved more extraperigastric lymph nodes, and had fewer errors during surgery compared to the LTG group. Additionally, the RTG group had a higher technical skill score, lower surgery task load index, and there was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity between the two groups.
Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes, surgery burden, and technical performance of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer (GC). Summary of Background Data: The impact of robotic systems on total gastrectomy remains obscure. Methods: This prospective study included 50 patients with advanced proximal GC underwent RTG combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy between March 2018 and February 2020. Patients who underwent LTG in the FUGES-002, http://links.lww.com/SLA/C929 study were enrolled to compare the outcomes between RTG and LTG. Results: After propensity score matching, 48 patients in the RTG group and 96 patients in the LTG group were included in the analysis. The RTG group had a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than the LTG group (38.7 vs 66.4 mL, P = 0.042). Significantly more extraperigastric lymph nodes were retrieved in the RTG group than in the LTG group (20.2 vs 17.5, P = 0.039). The average number of errors was lower in the RTG group than in the LTG group (43.2 vs 53.8 times/case, P < 0.001). The RTG group had a higher technical skill score (30.2 vs 28.4, P < 0.001) and a lower surgery task load index (33.2 vs 39.8, P < 0.001) than the LTG group. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (14.6% vs 16.7%, P = 0.748). Conclusions: In complex total gastrectomy for GC, compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery provides a technically superior operative environment and reduces surgeon workload at high-volume specialized institutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据