4.5 Article

Role of psychosocial factors in long-term adherence to secondary prevention measures after myocardial infarction: a longitudinal analysis

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 35-41

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.09.016

关键词

Adherence; Myocardial infarction; Psychosocial factors; Social support; Secondary prevention; Sense of coherence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Psychosocial factors have been linked to myocardial infarction (MI) outcomes. Whether psychosocial factors affect post-MI long-term adherence to secondary prevention recommendations remains uncertain. Methods: Patients <= 65 years (n = 616) were assessed for optimism, perceived social support (PSS), sense of coherence (SOC), anxiety, and depression at initial hospitalization for acute MI (1992-1993). Adherence to secondary prevention measures was recorded in interviews 3-6 months, 1-2, 5, and 10-13 years after MI. Prevention score (proportion of recommendations met) was developed based on: (1) medication adherence; (2) exercise; (3) nonsmoking; (4) healthy diet; (5) maintaining recommended body weight. Associations between psychosocial factors and prevention scores were estimated using Generalized Estimating Equation models. The role of the prevention score in long-term survival was assessed using time-dependent Cox regression analysis. Results: Average follow-up prevention scores ranged from 0.70 to 0.80 (SD, approximate to 0.20). After multivariable adjustment, PSS (beta = 0.087, P = .002, per 1 SD increase) and SOC (beta = 0.082, P = .006, per 1 SD increase) were positively associated with secondary prevention adherence. The prevention score predicted survival over 23-year follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68-0.91, per 1 SD increase). Conclusions: Psychosocial factors following MI, particularly PSS and SOC, were associated with long-term adherence to secondary prevention measures. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据