4.7 Review

Review: Potential alternatives to high-concentration carbon dioxide stunning of pigs at slaughter

期刊

ANIMAL
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100164

关键词

Animal welfare; Aversion; Controlled atmosphere; Gases; Unconsciousness

资金

  1. Eurogroup for Animals and Compassion inWorld Farming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that alternative methods to stunning pigs with carbon dioxide are not prominent, and there is a need to increase research and development efforts to improve animal welfare during slaughter.
Using carbon dioxide (CO2) for stunning pigs at slaughter is common in Europe. The use of group stunning is a major advantage with CO2, which is done without restraining the pigs and with minimized human contact. However, high concentrations of CO2 have been known for decades to cause pain, fear and distress in pigs before loss of consciousness, and the stunning method is clearly associated with animal welfare concerns. This study reviewed the scientific literature to find recent developments or evaluations of alternative methods that could lead to the replacement of CO2 for stunning pigs at slaughter. Potential alternative methods found in the literature were described and then assessed to identify specific research and development needs for their further development. Only 15 empirical studies were found in the search of peer-reviewed literature since 2004, which is less than one per year. Furthermore, half of the studies focused on evaluating methods to improve high-concentration CO2 stunning rather than an alternative to CO2. Since no clear alternative has emerged, nor a method to improve CO2 stunning, there is obviously a strong need to focus research and development to find solutions for improving animal welfare when stunning pigs at slaughter. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Animal Consortium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据