4.8 Article

Simultaneous Dual-Gene Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Based on CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Lateral Flow Assay

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 5307-5315

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202014506

关键词

genes; polymerases; RNA; SARS-CoV-2; viruses

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91959128, 21874049, 21904042, 81772246]
  2. Special Project of Science and Technology Development of Guangdong Province [2017B020207011]
  3. Special Support Program of Guangdong Province [2016TQ03R749]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics of Hunan University [2019004]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry [SKLEAC202001]
  6. Key Research and Development Plan of Hubei Province [2020BCA090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The newly developed method can simultaneously detect two SARS-CoV-2 genes in a single test, showing high sensitivity and accuracy, providing a more accurate and convenient pathway for COVID-19 diagnosis in low-resource regions.
Few methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 currently have the capability to simultaneously detect two genes in a single test, which is a key measure to improve detection accuracy, as adopted by the gold standard RT-qPCR method. Developed here is a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated triple-line lateral flow assay (TL-LFA) combined with multiplex reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) for rapid and simultaneous dual-gene detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a single strip test. This assay is characterized by the detection of envelope (E) and open reading frame 1ab (Orf1ab) genes from cell-cultured SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA standards, showing a sensitivity of 100 RNA copies per reaction (25 mu L). Furthermore, dual-gene analysis of 64 nasopharyngeal swab samples showed 100 % negative predictive agreement and 97.14 % positive predictive agreement. This platform will provide a more accurate and convenient pathway for diagnosis of COVID-19 or other infectious diseases in low-resource regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据