4.8 Editorial Material

The Challenge of Peptide Proteolytic Stability Studies: Scarce Data, Difficult Readability, and the Need for Harmonization

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 4, 页码 1686-1688

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202006372

关键词

degradation; peptides; proteolysis; stability

资金

  1. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PD/BD/128281/2017, PTDC/BBB-NAN/1578/2014, PTDC/BIA-VIR/29495/2017, PTDC/QUI-NUC/30147/2017, UID/Multi/04349/2019]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation (MINECO) [AGL2014-52395-C2-2-R, AGL2017-84097-C2-2-R]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation (Maria de Maeztu Program for Centers of Excellence)
  4. European Union [828774]
  5. La Caixa Banking Foundation [HR17-00409]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BBB-NAN/1578/2014, PTDC/BIA-VIR/29495/2017, PD/BD/128281/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteolytic stability assessment is seen as a crucial aspect of peptide characterization, with challenges in comparing data due to varying assay methods and reporting styles. Guidelines for better communication among experts are suggested for improved data readability and utilization of peptide stability information.
Proteolytic stability assessment is increasingly viewed as a fundamental component of peptide characterization, arguably of comparable importance as efficacy and toxicity data. A literature survey over the last decade reveals steady growth in the stability information available. However, it also uncovers two significant problems that hinder proper data comparison: 1) the use of different stability assays, and 2) the differences in how stability information is reported. In this Viewpoint, we present results from a database meta-analysis as well as concerns about the stability assessments published so far. We also suggest guidelines for a proper discussion between experts in the field on how to improve data readability so that peptide stability, an often-missing parameter in older literature, is adequately reported to take maximum advantage of it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据