4.8 Article

Silver in the Center Enhances Room-Temperature Phosphorescence of a Platinum Sub-nanocluster by 18 Times

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 9, 页码 4551-4554

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202012921

关键词

metal clusters; nanoparticles; photoluminescence; platinum; silver

资金

  1. JST ERATO, Japan [JPMJER1503]
  2. JST PRESTO, Japan [JPMJPR1511]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP 19J14680, JP 19H02535, 19J14680]
  4. Cooperative Research Program of Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19J14680] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controversy surrounds the roles of metal core and shell in photoluminescence of ligand-protected metal nanoclusters. The inclusion of silver ions in a platinum-thiolate complex led to a significant increase in photoluminescent quantum yield. DFT calculations showed that LUMO, with contributions from Ag s-orbital and Pt d-orbitals, played a critical role in suppressing structural distortion in the excited state.
There has been controversy surrounding the roles of the metal core (metal-metal interaction) and the shell (metal-ligand interaction) in photoluminescence of ligand-protected metal nanoclusters. We have discovered aggregation-induced room-temperature phosphorescence of a platinum-thiolate complex and its silver ion inclusion complex (a silver-doped platinum sub-nanocluster). The inclusion of silver ion boosted the photoluminescent quantum yield by 18 times. Photophysical measurements indicate that the rate of nonradiative decay was slower for the silver-doped platinum sub-nanocluster. DFT calculations showed that the LUMO, which had the main contribution from Ag s-orbital and Pt d-orbitals, played a critical role in suppressing the structural distortion at the excited state. This work will hopefully stimulate more research on designing strategies based on molecular orbitals of atomicity-precise luminescent multimetallic nanoclusters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据