4.8 Article

A Urease-Containing Fluorescent Hydrogel for Transient Information Storage

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 7, 页码 3640-3646

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202011645

关键词

anti-counterfeiting; enzyme catalysis; fluorescent hydrogel; information decryption; information storage

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1606600, 2019YFC1606603, 2018YFB1105100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873223, 51773215, 21774138]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M671828]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2017337, 2019297]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-SLH036]
  6. K.C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2019-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a fluorescent hydrogel containing urease for multistage information security protection. The hydrogel displays decrypted information in the presence of urea and automatically erases it within a few minutes.
The improper handling of decrypted information can lead to the leakage of confidential data. Thus, there is increasing interest in the development of self-erasing decrypted data. Herein, we report a urease-containing fluorescent hydrogel for multistage information security protection. Information can be input into the fluorescent hydrogel, which is based on the protonated 4-(N,N-dimethylaminoethylene) amino-N-allyl-1,8-naphthalimide (DEAN-H+) and doped with urease, using metal ions, such as Zn2+ that coordinate with DEAN. Upon exposure to urea, urease produces NH3, which reduces the fluorescence of the hydrogel. In the presence of urea, metal-coordinated hydrogel fluorescence decreases more slowly than the fluorescence of the hydrogel alone, revealing the information. The displayed information is then automatically erased within a few minutes. This work opens up a new insights in designing and fabricating information storage materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据