4.8 Article

Enhancing the Sensitivity of Photoelectrochemical DNA Biosensing Using Plasmonic DNA Barcodes and Differential Signal Readout

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 13, 页码 7316-7322

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202014329

关键词

biosensors; differential signaling; DNA barcodes; nucleic acid detection; photoelectrochemistry

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Ontario Early Researcher Award
  3. Canada Research Chairs Program
  4. McMaster University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a new PEC biosensing strategy that increases the detection sensitivity and specificity of DNA biosensors in biological samples by combining signals from two related binding events using differential signal generation. This new strategy demonstrated a detection limit of 3 fM, showing up to a 15- and three-fold increase in limit of detection and sensitivity, respectively, compared to previous PEC assays with a single binding event.
Photoelectrochemical biosensors hold great promise for sensitive bioanalysis; however, similar to their electrochemical analogues, they are highly affected by the variable backgrounds caused by biological matrices. We developed a new PEC biosensing strategy that uses differential signal generation, combining signals from two separate but correlated binding events on the biosensor, for improving the limit-of-detection, sensitivity, and specificity of PEC DNA biosensors in biological samples. In this assay, the binding of unlabeled target DNA is followed by the capture of a signal amplification barcode featuring a plasmonic nanoparticle. The interaction of the plasmonic barcode with the semiconductive building blocks of the biosensor results in significant signal amplification, and together with differential signal processing enhances the limit of detection and sensitivity of the assay by up to 15- and three-fold, respectively, compared to the previously-used PEC assays with a single binding event, demonstrating a limit of detection of 3 fM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据