4.8 Article

Robust Biological Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework with Post-Functionalized Rhenium(I) Sites for Efficient Heterogeneous Visible-Light-Driven CO2 Reduction

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 16, 页码 8983-8989

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202016710

关键词

carbon dioxide reduction; heterogeneous catalysis; hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks; post-modification; visible-light photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21631003, 21805005, 22011540002]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-BD-20-14A, FRF-IDRY-19-028]
  3. University of Science and Technology Beijing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A robust biological hydrogen-bonded framework (HOF-25) derived from 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy) was utilized to covalently attach Re(bpy)(CO)(3)Cl segments, showing good heterogeneous catalytic activity for carbon dioxide photoreduction with high CO production rate and selectivity.
A robust 2,2 '-bipyridine (bpy)-derived biological hydrogen-bonded framework (HOF-25) has been realized depending on guanine-quadruplex with the assistance of pi-pi interaction, which reacts with Re(CO)(5)Cl to give a post-functionalized HOF-25-Re. X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopic study on HOF-25-Re confirms the covalent attachment of Re(bpy)(CO)(3)Cl segments to this HOF. Robust and recycled HOF-25-Re bearing photocatalytic Re(bpy)(CO)(3)Cl centers displays good heterogeneous catalytic activity towards carbon dioxide photoreduction in the presence of [Ru(bpy)(3)]Cl-2 and triisopropanolamine in CH3CN under visible-light irradiation, with both high CO production rate of 1448 mu mol g(-1) h(-1) and high selectivity of 93 %. Under the same conditions, the experimental turnover number of HOF-25-Re (50) is about 8 times as that of the homogeneous control Re(bpy)(CO)(3)Cl. The sustainably regenerated HOF-25-Re via crystallization and post-modification processes shows recovered photocatalytic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据