4.8 Article

Dually-Passivated Perovskite Solar Cells with Reduced Voltage Loss and Increased Super Oxide Resistance

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 15, 页码 8303-8312

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202017148

关键词

defects; dual-passivation; perovskite solar cells; stability; superoxide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975260, 51863012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells has rapidly improved, but defects at the grain boundaries and surfaces remain a challenge. A dual-passivation strategy effectively reduces defect density, enhancing device performance and stability.
In recent years, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) has witnessed rapid progress. Nevertheless, the pervasive defects prone to non-radiative recombination and decomposition exist at the surface and the grain boundaries (GBs) of the polycrystalline perovskite films. Herein, we report a comprehensive dual-passivation (DP) strategy to effectively passivate the defects at both surface and GBs to enhance device performance and stability further. Firstly, a fluorinated perylene-tetracarboxylic diimide derivative is permeated in the perovskite metaphase during antisolvent treatment, and then a fluorinated bulky aromatic ammonium salt is introduced over the annealed perovskite. The reduction of defect density can be unambiguously proved by the superoxide species generation/quenching reaction. As a result, optimized planar PSCs demonstrate a decreased open-circuit voltages deficit from 0.47 to 0.39 V and the best efficiency of 23.80 % from photocurrent scanning with a stabilized maximum power output efficiency of 22.99 %. Without encapsulation, one typical device can maintain over 85 % of the initial efficiency after heating on a hot plate at 100 degrees C for 30 h under relative humidity (RH) of 70 %. When the device is aged under 30 +/- 5 % RH, over 97 % of its initial PCE is retained after 1700 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据