4.3 Review

Potential Anthropogenic Pollution of High-technology Metals with a Focus on Rare Earth Elements in Environmental Water

期刊

ANALYTICAL SCIENCES
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 131-143

出版社

JAPAN SOC ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.20SAR16

关键词

ICP-MS; trace metal; REEs; gadolinium; river water; coastal seawater; ecotoxicology; bioaccessibility; speciation; concentration anomaly

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP19K12300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides an overview of the potential anthropogenic pollution caused by high-technology metals, with a focus on rare earth elements released into environmental waters. The review discusses the analytical methods of rare earth elements and highlights the importance of comprehensive multielement analysis for further screening potential anthropogenic pollution.
In recent years, the utilization of high-technology metals such as rare earth elements (REEs), which exist in extremely low quantities in the Earth, has rapidly increased with the development of new types of industrial materials and pharmaceutical products. This review provides an overview of a new type of potential anthropogenic pollution caused by high-technology metals, with a focus on REEs released into environmental waters from waste treatment plants. In this paper, potential anthropogenic pollution was defined as pollution caused by metals gradually enriched in the environment by human activity, although standard and guideline concentrations of these elements are not regulated by environmental quality standards for water pollution. We review the analytical methods of REEs and the potential anthropogenic pollution of REEs with a focus on Gd, from the viewpoints of a comparison of the degree of Gd anomaly, chemical speciation, ecotoxicology, and bioaccessibility. Moreover, we also highlight the comprehensive analysis based on multielement analysis of high-technology metals as well as REEs for the further screening for potential anthropogenic pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据