4.8 Article

NiCoO2@CeO2 Nanoboxes for Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Immunosensing Based on the Oxygen Evolution Reaction in a Neutral Medium: Application for Interleukin-6 Detection

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 24, 页码 16267-16273

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04217

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21705045, 21305041]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Hunan Province [2018RS3062]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ50385, 2018JJ2252]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Changsha [KQ1905028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of highly active electrocatalytic labels is important for constructing sensitive electrochemical immunosensors. Great progress has been made in developing non-noble-metal nanocatalysts toward the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in the past decade, but non-noble-metal OER nanocatalysts have not been explored as electrocatalytic labels for immunosensing. Herein, we report NiCoO2@CeO2 nanoboxes (NBs) as novel electrocatalytic labels for ultrasensitive immunosensing based on the excellent OER activity of NiCoO2@CeO2 NBs in a neutral solution. The synthesis of NiCoO2@CeO2 NBs involves Ni2+ exchange and heat treatment of ZIF-67 nanocubes to produce NiCoO2 NBs, followed by the growth of CeO2 nanoparticles on the surface of NiCoO2 NBs. The NiCoO2@CeO2 NBs offer superior OER activity to NiCoO2 NBs because of the synergetic effect between NiCoO2 NBs and CeO2 nanoparticles. The formation of ester-like bridging between CeO2 and the carboxylic groups of antibody enables direct immobilization of the antibody on the NiCoO2@CeO2 surface. A sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor using NiCoO2@CeO2 NBs as electrocatalytic labels features a broad linear range for interleukin-6 detection from 2.5 x 10(-5) to 10 ng mL(-1), with a low detection limit of 7 fg mL(-1). Our work lays the foundation for developing electrochemical immunosensors and aptasensors based on non-noble-metal OER electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据