4.8 Article

Ratiometric Detection of DNA and Protein in Serum by a Universal Tripyridinyl RuII Complex-Encapsulated SiO2@Polydopamine Fluorescence Nanoplatform

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 24, 页码 15908-15915

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03306

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675018]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT18LK37]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluorescence ratiometric biosensors are valuable tools for the accurate and sensitive prediction and diagnosis of diseases. However, seldom have fluorescence ratiometric biosensors for protein and DNA been reported because of the shortage of suitable nanoscale scaffolds. Herein, a tripyridinyl Ru-II complex-encapsulated SiO2@polydopamine (Ru-SiO2@PDA) nanocomposite was designed as a universal platform for fluorescence ratiometric detection of DNA and protein in serum samples. The Ru-SiO2@PDA nanocomposites have a narrow size distribution, exhibit good biosafety, and are convenient for the post-modification of biorecognition elements. Under irradiation, they can emit a stable and strong luminescence at 650 nm and simultaneously quench the fluorescence emitted from the fluorophores getting close to them. Once the capture probes such as single-stranded DNA and aptamer are assembled, the fluorophores labeled on them are then brought close to their PDA shell and quenched. However, the biorecognition behaviors change the probe's configuration and take the fluorophore far away from the PDA shell. Correspondingly, the fluorescence recovers and its ratio to the constant fluorescence reference is linear to the targets' concentration. Using a D-catalyst and thrombin as model analytes, the Ru-SiO2@PDA-based nanoplatform shows high sensitivity and good accuracy in the serum sample analysis. Regarding these attractive properties, the Ru-SiO2@PDA nanoplatform provides a new avenue for the accurate and sensitive fluorescence assay of a wide range of targets in complex systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据