4.5 Article

Single probe PCR melting curve analysis MTHFR C677T SNP sites

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 619, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2021.114102

关键词

Direct blood PCR; MTHFR C677T; TaqMan-probe; Folic acid; Melting curve

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81702580]
  2. Key R&D Planning Project of Jiangxi Science and Technology Commission, China [20203BBGL73126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have successfully established a method for detecting MTHFR C677T SNPs directly from whole blood samples via PCR, which is reliable, simple, rapid, and cost-effective, and could serve as a potential diagnostic tool for various diseases.
Background: The detection and analysis of methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T single nudeotide polymorphism (SNP) from blood samples is time-consuming and costly. We aimed to establish a method to detect these SNPs by direct whole blood PCR and without DNA extraction. Methods: Probes modified by different fluorescent groups on the same sequence were designed. Various MTHFR genotypes from direct blood PCR experiments were used to verify the similarity of the obtained and sequencing results. The SNP sites adjacent to the MTHFR C677T SNP were used to verify whether the method can accurately distinguish these sites. Results: The ROX probe was found to be the most suitable for this study. We tested 291 samples with 1 mu L whole blood as a template, and obtained 126, 43, and 122 cases of C677C, C677T, and C677 C/T genotypes, respectively. The melting curve was consistent with the sequencing results. The detection limit was approximately 1000 white blood cells/mu L. Through PCR and the melting curve method, the adjacent sites were accurately distinguished. Conclusion: We established a reliable, simple, rapid, and low-cost direct blood PCR method for the detection of MTHFR C677T SNPs. This could also be used as a potential diagnostic tool for a variety of diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据