4.7 Article

Upconverting nanoparticle reporter-based highly sensitive rapid lateral flow immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 413, 期 4, 页码 967-978

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-03055-z

关键词

HBsAg; HBV diagnostics; Upconverting nanophosphors; Lateral flow; Point-of-care test

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust, UK [106295/A/14/Z]
  2. BIRAC, India [106295/A/14/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust [106295/A/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test for hepatitis B Virus surface antigen (HBsAg) was developed in this study, which can meet the needs for patients with low levels of HBsAg and blood screening. UCNP-LFIA showed higher sensitivity and accuracy in sample detection, making it a reliable detection method.
Detection of hepatitis B Virus surface antigen (HBsAg) is an established method for diagnosing both acute and chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In addition to enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are available for the detection of HBsAg in resource-poor settings. However, the available RDTs have inadequate sensitivity and therefore are not suitable for diagnosis of patients with low levels of HBsAg and for blood screening. To provide a high-sensitivity RDT, we developed a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for HBsAg utilizing upconverting nanoparticle (UCNP) reporter. The UCNP-LFIA can use whole blood, serum, or plasma and the results can be read in 30 min using a reader device. When compared with a commercial conventional visually read LFIA, the developed UCNP-LFIA had a Limit of Detection (LoD) of 0.1 IU HBsAg/ml in spiked serum, whereas the LoD of the conventional LFIA was 3.2 IU HBsAg/ml. The developed UCNP-LFIA fulfills the WHO criterion for blood screening (LoD <= 0.13 IU HBsAg/ml) in terms of LoD. The UCNP-LFIA and conventional LFIA were evaluated with well-characterized sample panels. The UCNP-LFIA detected 20/24 HBsAg-positive samples within the HBsAg Performance Panel and 8/10 samples within the Mixed Titer Performance Panel, whereas the conventional LFIA detected 8/24 and 4/10 samples in these panels, respectively. The performance of the assays was further evaluated with HBsAg-positive (n = 108) and HBsAg-negative (n = 315) patient samples. In comparison with a central laboratory test, UCNP-LFIA showed 95.4% (95% CI: 89.5-98.5%) sensitivity whereas sensitivity of the conventional LFIA was 87.7% (95%CI: 79.9-93.3%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据