4.7 Article

Improved metabolite characterization by liquid chromatography- Tandem mass spectrometry through electron impact type fragments from adduct ions

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338207

关键词

Electron induced dissociation; Collision induced dissociation; Metabolites; Adducts; LC-MS

资金

  1. Swiss National Sciences Foundation [206021_170779]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [206021_170779] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated CID and EID fragmentation mechanisms in LC-MS analysis, revealing that EID is superior to CID in generating specific and informative fragments for metabolite identification. EID also has the capability to provide structural information from adduct ions, offering the possibility for new metabolite characterization.
Using a chimeric collision cell mounted on a quadrupole time-of-flight platform, collision induced dissociation (CID) and electron induced dissociation (EID) were investigated for the LC-MS analysis of low molecular weight compounds including drugs and endogenous metabolites. Compared to CID, EID fragmentation of the [M+H](+) species (10-20 eV) from standard compounds resulted in additional specific and informative fragments, mostly due to neutral losses and, in some cases due to ring openings. Some analytes, for example reserpine and vinpocetine, provided characteristic [M broken vertical bar H]center dot(2+) species. For most analytes for sodium and potassium adducts and multimers a radical cation M center dot(+)thorn and electron impact type fragments were observed in the EID spectra, providing the opportunity to use EI libraries to support metabolite identification. EID opens the possibility to get structural information from adduct ions which is often not the case with CID. EID enabled the putative characterization of two metabolites in rat urine as glucuronides of 5,6-dihydroxyindole based on EID fragmentation of the potassium adducts. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据