4.7 Article

An ultra-sensitive and selective AChE based colorimetric detection of malathion using silver nanoparticle-graphene oxide (Ag-GO) nanocomposite

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1142, 期 -, 页码 73-83

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.10.057

关键词

Acetylcholinesterase; Acetylthiocholine; Malathion; Graphene oxide; AgNPs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a rapid and precise sensing strategy based on AChE inhibition was proposed for the detection of malathion using Ag-GO and ATCh. The nanocomposite of Ag-GO was successfully developed for the rapid and accurate detection of malathion, with good recovery rates in different samples.
Herein, we propose rapid, precise acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition-based sensing strategy for malathion detection in the presence of Ag-GO and acetylthiocholine (ATCh). The biosensing method was developed with a nanocomposite of citrate stabilized AgNPs anchored on the GO sheets (Ag-GO). The physical and chemical properties of the prepared Ag-GO composite were analyzed with various characterization techniques, including XRD, FT-IR, XPS, UV-Visible spectroscopy, and HR-TEM. The positively charged thiocholine (TCh) produced by enzyme hydrolysis triggers the AgNPs aggregation on GO sheets, which ultimately decreases the intensity of the corresponding SPR absorption peak. While the addition of malathion into the sensing system hindered the AChE activity and limited the TCh production, and thus inhibits the decrease in the SPR band intensity. The designed sensing system displayed linearity in the broad range of malathion concentrations (0.01 pM-1000 pM) with a limit of detection and the limit of quantification values of 0.01 pM, and 0.035 pM, respectively. The application of the designed biosensing system was extended to determine the malathion in actual samples namely, tap water, agricultural runoff water, lake water, and grape extract, which resulted in almost 100% recovery rates in all the spiked samples. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据