4.6 Review

Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Schizophrenia

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 178, 期 6, 页码 509-521

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20030340

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke (NINDS)
  3. National Institute onAging(NIA)
  4. Patient-CenteredOutcomesResearchInstitute
  5. Stanley Foundation
  6. J.B. Fuqua Foundation
  7. Minnesota's Discovery, Research, and InnoVation Economy (MnDRIVE) initiative
  8. Minnesota Medical Discovery Team on Addictions
  9. NIH
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals
  11. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  12. NIMH [K23MH106683, R01MH118484]
  13. Cervel Neurotherapeutics
  14. NeoSync
  15. Neuronetics
  16. Soterix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome with no objective biological markers available for diagnostic or treatment decisions. Neuroimaging is considered a promising tool for biomarker development in schizophrenia, as it can capture phenotypic variations in disease targets, validate new treatment targets, predict response, aid in therapy selection, and provide rationale for personalized treatments.
Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome with a heterogeneous genetic, neurobiological, and phenotypic profile. Currently, no objective biological measures-that is, biomarkers-are available to inform diagnostic or treatment decisions. Neuroimaging is well positioned for biomarker development in schizophrenia, as it may capture phenotypic variations inmolecular and cellular disease targets, or in brain circuits. These mechanistically based biomarkers may represent a direct measure of the pathophysiological underpinnings of the disease process and thus could serve as true intermediate or surrogate endpoints. Effective biomarkers could validate new treatment targets or pathways, predict response, aid in selection of patients for therapy, determine treatment regimens, and provide a rationale for personalized treatments. In this review, the authors discuss a range of mechanistically plausible neuroimaging biomarker candidates, including dopamine hyperactivity, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction, hippocampal hyperactivity, immune dysregulation, dysconnectivity, and cortical gray matter volume loss. They then focus on the putative neuroimaging biomarkers for disease risk, diagnosis, target engagement, and treatment response in schizophrenia. Finally, they highlight areas of unmet need and discuss strategies to advance biomarker development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据