4.6 Article

Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake by Adult Women Attending Cervical Cancer Screening in 9 European Countries

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 60, 期 4, 页码 478-487

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.032

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [603019]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spanish Government)
  3. FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund-a way to build Europe (Redes tematicas de investigacion cooperativa en salud) [RD12/0036/0056]
  4. FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund-a way to build Europe (Juan de la Cierva de Incorporacion) [IJCI-2016-29502]
  5. FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund-a way to build Europe (Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red: Epidemiologia y Salud Publica) [CB06/02/0073]
  6. FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund-a way to build Europe (Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red: Oncologia) [CB16/12/00401]
  7. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (Catalan Government) [2014SGR756, 2014SGR1077, 2017SGR793, 2017SGR1718, 2017SGR1085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that acceptance and completion of the human papillomavirus vaccination program in adult women largely depended on recruitment method, national vaccination program coverage, and personal relationship status. Knowledge of the benefits and safety of the vaccine may be crucial in expanding the target age for vaccination.
Introduction: Human papillomavirus-vaccinated cohorts, irrespective of age, will likely reduce their subsequent screening requirements, thus opening opportunities for global cost reduction and program sustainability. The determinants of uptake and completion of a 3-dose human papillomavirus vaccination program by adult women in a European context were estimated. Study design: This was an intervention study. Setting/participants: Study participants were women aged 25-45 years, attending opportunistic or population-based cervical cancer screening in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom between April 2016 and May 2018. Intervention: Study participants completed a questionnaire on awareness and attitudes on adult female human papillomavirus vaccination and were invited to receive free human papillomavirus vaccination. Main outcome measures: Main outcome measures were acceptance, uptake, and completion of vaccination schedule. Determinants of vaccine uptake were explored using multilevel logistic models in 2019. Results: Among 3,646 participants, 2,748 (range by country=50%-96%) accepted vaccination, and 2,151 (range=30%-93%) received the full vaccination course. The factors associated with higher vaccine acceptance were previous awareness of adult female (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.00, 1.48) and male (OR=1.59, 95% CI=1.28, 1.97) vaccination. Women in stable relationships (OR=0.56, 95% CI=0.45, 0.69) or with higher educational level (OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.63, 0.93) were more likely to refuse vaccination. Recruitment by postal invitation versus personal invitation from a healthcare professional resulted in lower vaccine acceptance (OR=0.13, 95% CI=0.02, 0.76). Vaccination coverage of >70% of adolescent girls in national public programs was of borderline significance in predicting human papillomavirus vaccine uptake (OR=3.23, 95% CI=0.95, 10.97). The main reasons for vaccine refusal were vaccine safety concerns (range=30%-59%) and the need for more information on human papillomavirus vaccines (range=1%-72%). No safety issues were experienced by vaccinated women. Conclusions: Acceptance and schedule completion were largely dependent on recruitment method, achieved coverage of national vaccination programs, and personal relationship status. Knowledge of benefits and safety reassurance may be critical to expanding vaccination target ages. Study results suggest that there are no major opinion barriers in adult women to human papillomavirus vaccination, especially when vaccination is offered face to face in healthcare settings. (C) 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据