4.6 Article

The Benefits of Vaccinating With the First Available COVID-19 Coronavirus Vaccine

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 605-613

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (New York City, NY)
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [1R01HS028165-01]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Bethestha, MD), Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study Network [1R01GM127512-01A1, 3R01GM127512-01A1S1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During a pandemic, waiting for a vaccine with higher efficacy is not always the best choice, as it may result in more hospitalizations and costs, except for early on in the pandemic and for vaccines that prevent infection effectively.
Introduction: During a pandemic, there are many situations in which the first available vaccines may not have as high effectiveness as vaccines that are still under development or vaccines that are not yet ready for distribution, raising the question of whether it is better to go with what is available now or wait. Methods: In 2020, the team developed a computational model that represents the U.S. population, COVID-19 coronavirus spread, and vaccines with different possible efficacies (to prevent infection or to reduce severe disease) and vaccination timings to estimate the clinical and economic value of vaccination. Results: Except for a limited number of situations, mainly early on in a pandemic and for a vaccine that prevents infection, when an initial vaccine is available, waiting for a vaccine with a higher efficacy results in additional hospitalizations and costs over the course of the pandemic. For example, if a vaccine with a 50% efficacy in preventing infection becomes available when 10% of the population has already been infected, waiting until 40% of the population are infected for a vaccine with 80% efficacy in preventing infection results in 15.6 million additional cases and 1.5 million additional hospitalizations, costing $20.6 billion more in direct medical costs and $12.4 billion more in productivity losses. Conclusions: This study shows that there are relatively few situations in which it is worth foregoing the first COVID-19 vaccine available in favor of a vaccine that becomes available later on in the pandemic even if the latter vaccine has a substantially higher efficacy. (C) 2021 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据