4.7 Article

Residues of currently used pesticides in soils and earthworms: A silent threat?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107167

关键词

Soil-Dwelling invertebrates; Agroecology; Plant protection products; Risk assessment; Nontarget wildlife

资金

  1. French Biodiversity Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that the exposure to multiple classes of currently used pesticides poses a threat to earthworms in arable landscapes, with a high percentage of soils and earthworms contaminated at levels that could endanger these beneficial soil organisms. Chronic toxicity to earthworms was found in both treated winter cereals and untreated habitats, indicating potential negative impacts on biodiversity, recovery, and ecosystem functions. These results highlight the importance of regulating pesticides and promoting sustainable agriculture practices to address global environmental challenges.
Critical knowledge gaps about environmental fate and unintentional effects of currently used pesticides (CUPs) hamper the understanding and mitigation of their global impacts on ecological processes. We investigated the exposure of earthworms to 31 multiclass CUPs in an arable landscape in France. We highlighted the presence of at least one pesticide in all soils (n = 180) and 92 % of earthworms (n = 155) both in treated crops and nontreated habitats (hedgerows, grasslands, and cereals under organic farming). Mixtures of at least one insecticide, one herbicide, and one fungicide (> limit of quantification) contaminated 90 % of soils and 54 % of earthworms at levels that could endanger these nontarget beneficial soil organisms. A high risk of chronic toxicity to earthworms was found (46 % of samples) both in treated winter cereals and nontreated habitats considered as refuges. This may alter biodiversity, hinder recovery, and impair ecosystem functions. These results provide essential insights for sustainable agriculture and CUP regulation, and highlight the potential of pesticides as agents of global change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据