4.6 Article

Identification of prognostic aging-related genes associated with immunosuppression and inflammation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

AGING-US
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 25778-25804

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.104199

关键词

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); aging-related genes (AGs); prognosis; inflammation; immunosuppression

资金

  1. Health and Family Planning Commission of Hunan Province [20201921, 20201947, B20180186]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ50547]
  3. Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Cellular and Molecular Pathology [2016TP1015]
  4. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department [2017Sk50206]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is regarded as a dominant risk factor for cancer. Additionally, inflammation and asthenic immune surveillance with aging may facilitate tumor formation and development. However, few studies have comprehensively analyzed the relationship between aging-related genes (AGs) and the prognosis, inflammation and tumor immunity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we initially screened 41 differentially expressed AGs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. In the training set, a prognosis risk model with seven AGs (APP, CDKN2A, EGFR, HSPD1, IL2RG, PLAU and VEGFA) was constructed and validated in the TCGA test set and the GEO set (P < 0.05). Using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, we confirmed that risk score was an independent prognostic factor of HNSCC patients. In addition, a high risk score was significantly correlated with immunosuppression, and high expression of PLAU, APP and EGFR was the main factor. Furthermore, we confirmed that a high risk score was significantly associated with levels of proinflammatory factors (IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6 and IL-8) in HNSCC samples. Thus, this risk model may serve as a prognostic signature and provide clues for individualized immunotherapy for HNSCC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据