4.5 Article

Semi-interpenetrating Network Membrane from Polyethyleneimine-Epoxy Resin and Polybenzimidazole for HT-PEM Fuel Cells

期刊

ADVANCES IN POLYMER TECHNOLOGY
卷 2020, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3845982

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFA0702002, 2019YFA0705701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [U1601211]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program (Japan-China Joint Research Program) [2017YFE0197900]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1601211, 51573215, 21506260, 21706294, 21978332]
  5. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2017B090901003, 2019A1515010803, 2020A151501445]
  6. Guangzhou Scientific and Technological Planning Project [201804020025, 201707010424, 201904010271]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [18lgpy32, 19lgpy07, 20lgpy11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, a semi-interpenetrating network (semi-IPN) high-temperature proton exchange membrane based on polyethyleneimine (PEI), epoxy resin (ER), and polybenzimidazole (PBI) was prepared and characterized, aiming at their future application in fuel cell devices. The physical properties of the semi-IPN membrane are characterized by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and tensile strength test. The results indicate that the as-prepared PEI-ER/PBI semi-IPN membranes possess excellent thermal stability and mechanical strength. After phosphoric acid (PA) doping treatment, the semi-IPN membranes show high proton conductivities. PA doping level and volume swelling ratio as well as proton conductivities of the semi-IPN membranes are found to be positively related to the PEI content. High proton conductivities of 3.9?7.8x10-2 S cm-1 are achieved at 160 degrees C for these PA-doped PEI-ER/PBI series membranes. H-2/O-2 fuel cell assembled with PA-doped PEI-ER(1 : 2)/PBI membrane delivered a peak power density of 170 mW cm(-2) at 160 degrees C under anhydrous conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据