4.7 Review

Recent Advances in Cross-Dehydrogenative Couplings (CDC) of C-H Bond in Aqueous Media

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 363, 期 5, 页码 1185-1201

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.202001358

关键词

Cross-dehydrogenative coupling; C-H bond; Water; Green chemistry; Synthesis

资金

  1. Open Research Fund of School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University [2020ZD02]
  2. Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology of Ministry of Education
  3. Hangzhou Normal University [KFJJ2021008]
  4. Postgraduate Innovation Foundation from Wuhan Institute of Technology [CX2019171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing highly efficient synthetic reactions is crucial in organic chemistry, and cross dehydrogenative couplings (CDC) is a method that utilizes C-H bonds to form new C-X (X=C, S, O, N, P) bonds. Water is increasingly used as a substitute for organic solvents in CDC reactions due to its non-toxicity and non-flammability. Recent advances in CDC reactions in aqueous phase have shown high atom utilization rates and environmental friendliness.
To develop highly efficient synthetic reactions is quite important in organic chemistry. Cross dehydrogenative couplings (CDC) utilize C-H bonds of substrates to construct new C-X (X=C, S, O, N, P) bonds. For CDC, the pre-functionalization of reaction substrates can be avoided and the C-X (X=C, S, O, N, P) bonds can be newly formed by simple and efficient synthesis routes. Meanwhile, water is increasingly used as a substitute for organic solvents in cross-dehydrogenative coupling because of its rich content, non-toxicity, and non- flammability. In recent years, organic chemists are devoted their efforts to explore the cross dehydrogenative couplings (CDC) in aqueous phase which feature high atom utilization rate and environmental friendliness. Herein, we summarized the recent advances in the construction of C-C, C-S, C-O, C-N, and C-P bonds through CDC reactions of C-H bonds in water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据