4.7 Article

Granule attrition by coupled particle impact and shearing

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 204-210

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2020.12.001

关键词

Attrition; Breakage; Impact; Shearing by rollers

资金

  1. Knowledge Transfer Partnership - UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) through Innovate UK [KTP006838]
  2. Du Pont
  3. Henkel
  4. Novozymes
  5. Procter and Gamble
  6. Unilever

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel device has been developed to simulate granule attrition and dust formation under realistic plant conditions, subjecting granules to multiple impacts and shear deformations. Tests are conducted to determine the settings required for desired impact velocity and shear strain rate, comparing results with data obtained by more established methods.
A novel device has been developed for continuous shearing and repeated impact of granules in order to simulate granule attrition and dust formation under realistic plant conditions of mechanical stresses, shear strains and strain rates. The device subjects the granules to multiple impacts at a range of velocities prevailing in typical process plants, and to shear deformations using two rollers with an adjustable gap to simulate the level of shear stresses and strains experienced during bulk motion, e.g. discharge from silos onto conveyor belts, etc. In this paper, the device operation and tests carried out to determine the settings required for attaining a desired impact velocity and shear strain rate are described. Subsequently, the extent of breakage of the granules is determined for the specified settings and the results are compared with data obtained by more established methods, e.g. annular shear cell and single particle impact tests. (c) 2021 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据