4.7 Article

Multi-modal transportation planning for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in humanitarian logistics

期刊

ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101223

关键词

Multi-modal transportation; Stochastic programming; Commodity rebalancing; Transportation planning; Humanitarian logistics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71861167002, 5183000192]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [NRF-2017R1A2B4004169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bi-objective stochastic optimization model is proposed for rebalancing and transporting commodities during disasters using a multi-modal transportation system. The model is linearized and an adaptive augmented E-constraint method is applied to obtain a number of Pareto-optimal solutions. A case study demonstrates decision making effectiveness, while sensitivity analysis on critical parameters is conducted.
Multi-commodity rebalancing plays a critical role before and during the attack of large-scale disasters. In practice, some relief centers can be out of reach from the ground for vehicles due to the road disruption. Accordingly, alternative transportation systems are essential to maximize fairness and minimize the total transportation time, simultaneously. However, little study has reported on this issue for humanitarian logistics. To address it, a bi-objective stochastic optimization model is proposed to rebalance and transport commodities with the multi-modal transportation system. This work first linearizes the model and then applies an adaptive augmented E-constraint method to obtain a number of Pareto-optimal solutions. Furthermore, a case study of an emergency event is carried out, of which the computational results indicate its decision making effectiveness. Lastly, sensitivity analysis on critical parameters is conducted and the trade-off between the objectives is also analyzed to provide valuable managerial insights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据