4.5 Article

Clinically meaningful changes on depressive symptom measures and patient-reported outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 143, 期 3, 页码 253-263

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.13260

关键词

depression; antidepressives; clinical aspects; quality of life; treatment

资金

  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using the CGI-S scale, this study identified clinically meaningful and substantial changes in the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 scores for patients with treatment-resistant depression. Clinically meaningful changes corresponded to 6-, 4-, and 3-point changes from baseline on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, while clinically substantial changes corresponded to 12-, 8-, and 6-point changes. The ESK plus OAD group showed a higher proportion of patients with substantial clinical improvement compared to the OAD plus PBO group after 28 days of treatment.
Objective To use the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale to estimate clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as measured using the Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods Pooled data were derived from two 4-week, randomized, active-controlled studies evaluating esketamine nasal spray (ESK) plus oral antidepressant (OAD) or OAD plus placebo nasal spray (PBO) in adults with TRD (N = 565). CGI-S, MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 scores were obtained at baseline and over 4 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, change scores on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 that corresponded to a clinically meaningful (1-point) or clinically substantial (2-point) change on the CGI-S scale were identified. Results Clinically meaningful changes in CGI-S scores after 28 days corresponded to 6-, 4-, and 3-point changes from baseline on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. Similarly, a 2-point CGI-S score change (clinically substantial change) corresponded to a 12-, 8-, and 6-point change on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. The proportion of patients showing substantial clinical improvement in the ESK plus OAD group versus the OAD plus PBO group after 28 days of treatment favored ESK plus OAD: 69.0% vs 55.3% (MADRS), 64.5% vs 48.9% (SDS), and 77.1% vs 64.7% (PHQ-9). Conclusion We provide a basis for identifying clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as assessed with commonly used outcome measures for depression to facilitate the translation of clinical trial results into clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据