4.4 Article

Defining the surgical footprint in cataract surgery: patient-related outcomes dependent on the experience of the surgeon

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 E999-E1005

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14733

关键词

cataract surgery; phacoemulsification; medical education; assessment; treatment surgery

资金

  1. Velux Foundation, Soborg, Denmark [16627]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of cataract surgeon experience on patient outcomes. Surgeries performed by novice surgeons resulted in significantly lower visual acuity and greater central corneal thickness compared to experienced surgeons.
Purpose To investigate which patient-related outcomes are dependent on the experience of the cataract surgeon. Methods The study was designed as a prospective observational study. Novice (<150 surgeries performed) and experienced (>1000 surgeries performed) cataract surgeons from the Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup and Nordsj AE llands Hospital - Hillerod were included in the study. Patients operated by the included surgeons were examined preoperatively, 1 day, 3 days, and 3 weeks after standard, noncomplicated cataract surgery. Primary outcomes were change in central corneal thickness and endothelial cell loss. Secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, aqueous flare, central macular thickness, and surgical complications. Results Surgery performed by novice surgeons resulted in significantly lower visual acuity (mean -3.6 letters (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)); 95% CI: -7.3; -0.4, p = 0.03) and greater corneal thickness (mean 26.7 mu m; 95% CI: 6.8; 46.6, p = 0.01) on the first day postoperative than surgery performed by experienced surgeons. Conclusion The experience of the cataract surgeon affected visual acuity and central corneal thickness in the immediate postoperative period. In the future, these patient-related outcomes may be used to assess the technical proficiency of surgical trainees and investigate the effect of different training programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据