4.4 Review

Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty

期刊

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
卷 163, 期 2, 页码 423-440

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04663-5

关键词

Cranioplasty; Rehabilitation; hydrocephalus; Decompressive craniectomy; Neurosurgery

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma [16/137/105]
  2. UK Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides the first set of practical consensus-based clinical recommendations on post-traumatic cranioplasty, focusing on timing, materials, complications, and surgical procedures. Future research directions are also presented in the document.
Background Due to the lack of high-quality evidence which has hindered the development of evidence-based guidelines, there is a need to provide general guidance on cranioplasty (CP) following traumatic brain injury (TBI), as well as identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach. Methods The international consensus meeting on post-traumatic CP was held during the International Conference on Recent Advances in Neurotraumatology (ICRAN), in Naples, Italy, in June 2018. This meeting was endorsed by the Neurotrauma Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, and several other neurotrauma organizations. Discussions and voting were organized around 5 pre-specified themes: (1) indications and technique, (2) materials, (3) timing, (4) hydrocephalus, and (5) paediatric CP. Results The participants discussed published evidence on each topic and proposed consensus statements, which were subject to ratification using anonymous real-time voting. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% for inclusion in the final recommendations. Conclusions This document is the first set of practical consensus-based clinical recommendations on post-traumatic CP, focusing on timing, materials, complications, and surgical procedures. Future research directions are also presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据