4.8 Article

Tannic Acid (TA)-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles for EpCAM-Independent Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Isolation from Patients with Different Cancers

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 3694-3700

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c20916

关键词

tannic acid; polyphenol structure; isolation; magnetic nanoparticles; CTCs

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21904135, 21775160, 32000984]
  2. Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180250, BE2018665]
  3. Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20192ACB21033]
  4. CAS International Cooperation Key program [121E32KYSB20170025]
  5. CAS/SAFEA International Innovation Teams program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method using tannic acid-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles to efficiently isolate heterogeneous circulating tumor cells has been established, with successful validation in clinical blood samples from patients with various cancers.
The majority of current methods of isolating circulating tumor cells (CTCs) rely on a biomarker. However, the isolation efficiency may be compromised due to the heterogeneity of CTCs. In this work, a simple and broad-spectrum method is established to efficiently isolate the heterogeneous CTCs from patient blood samples using tannic acid (TA)-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). The TA-functionalized MNPs (MNPs-TA) inhibit the nonspecific adhesion of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and enhance cancer cell capture, resulting from the unique interaction between TA and glycocalyx on cancer cells. The MNPs-TA was demonstrated to effectively capture seven kinds of cancer cells (HeLa, PC-3, T24, MAD-MB-231, MCF-7, HT1080, A549) from artificial samples (62.3-93.7%). Moreover, this epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM independent CTC isolation method was also tested using clinical blood samples from patients with different cancers (21 patients), which may provide a universal tool to detect CTCs in the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据