4.8 Article

Highly Efficient Silver Catalyst Supported by a Spherical Covalent Organic Framework for the Continuous Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 3209-3220

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c20444

关键词

covalent organic framework; catalytic reduction; organic pollutants; flow-through; silver nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51903247]
  2. Key Science and Technology Program of Yantai City [2018ZHGY075, 2019XDHZ093]
  3. Shandong Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes, YICCAS [2019SDHADKFJJ15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing new materials and novel technologies for the highly efficient treatment of toxic organic pollutants is highly desirable. A method based on a spherical covalent organic framework (SCOF) for catalytic reduction has been designed, showing high catalytic reduction ability towards 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) and far superior performance compared to previous reported results.
Developing new materials and novel technologies for the highly efficient treatment of toxic organic pollutants is highly desirable. Chemical reduction based on heterogeneous substrate/noble metal catalysts and the reducing agent NaBH4 has become an effective method in recent years. Here, a spherical covalent organic framework (SCOF) was designed to provide basic sites for Ag ions, by which small Ag NPs were immobilized on the SCOF to form Ag NPs@SCOF microspheres. The prepared microspheres exhibited a high catalytic reduction ability toward 4-nitrophenol (4-NP). An optimized permeation flux of 2000 L m(-2) h(-1) (LMH) and a more than 99% 4-NP reduction efficiency were obtained with flow-through experiments, which are far better than the reported results (below 200 LMH). Moreover, the microspheres could maintain stable catalytic performance under a continuous flow-through process. Our work provides an efficient material and technology that can be applied to easily treat toxic organic pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据