4.8 Article

Ruthenium-Assisted Chemical Etching of Silicon: Enabling CMOS-Compatible 3D Semiconductor Device Nanofabrication

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 1169-1177

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c17011

关键词

ruthenium; silicon nanowire; metal-assisted chemical etch; porosity; catalytic activity; CMOS-compatible

资金

  1. Cockrell School of Engineering
  2. Joe C. Walter Endowed Chair funds
  3. NSF [NNCI-1542159]
  4. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new ruthenium MacEtch process that is comparable in quality to gold MacEtch, achieved through the introduction of new process variables - catalyst plasma pretreatment and surface area. Ruthenium is desirable for being CMOS-compatible and already introduced in semiconductor fabrication. This breakthrough paves the way for scalable fabrication of 3D semiconductor devices, sensors, and biodevices.
The semiconductor industry's transition to three-dimensional (3D) logic and memory devices has revealed the limitations of plasma etching in reliable creation of vertical high aspect ratio (HAR) nanostructures. Metal-assisted chemical etch (MacEtch) can create ultra-HAR, taper-free nanostructures in silicon, but the catalyst used for reliable MacEtch-gold-is not CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor)-compatible and therefore cannot be used in the semiconductor industry. Here, for the first time, we report a ruthenium MacEtch process that is comparable in quality to gold MacEtch. We introduce new process variables-catalyst plasma pretreatment and surface area-to achieve this result. Ruthenium is particularly desirable as it is not only CMOS-compatible but has also been introduced in semiconductor fabrication as an interconnect material. The results presented here remove a significant barrier to adoption of MacEtch for scalable fabrication of 3D semiconductor devices, sensors, and biodevices that can benefit from production in CMOS foundries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据