4.8 Article

Versatile Phosphate Diester-Based Flame Retardant Vitrimers via Catalyst-Free Mixed Transesterification

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 51, 页码 57486-57496

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c18852

关键词

phosphate diester; vitrimer; recyclability; flame retardancy; mixed transesterification

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [OIA-1946231]
  2. Louisiana Board of Regents for the Louisiana Materials Design Alliance (LAMDA)
  3. National Science Foundation [1736136]
  4. NASA [NNX16AQ93A, NASA/LEQSF(2016-19)-Phase3-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We herein report a new vitrimer system integrated with UV curability, recyclability, and flame retardancy. Energy-efficiency, sustainability, and safety have been required features for next-generation polymer materials. Various attempts have been made to endow thermoset polymers with rapid prototyping capacity, recyclability, and flame retardancy. Thermoset vitrimers based on covalent adaptable networks (CANs) are recyclable and remoldable but are generally not UV curable or flame retardant. Here, we present a conceptually novel option to achieve fast exchange reactions in CANs via catalyst-free mixed transesterification of a UV curable phosphate diester-based acrylate cross-linker. In this system, the phosphate diesters serve as reversible covalent bonds, hydrogen bonding ligands, and flame-retardant structures, while acrylate groups serve as UV curable units as well as transesterification collaborators. After the facile UV curing, an intrinsic flame-retardant and mechanically strong dynamic network was achieved due to abundant hydrogen bonds between P-OH and C=O structures. Additionally, this highly cross-linked network exhibited an attractive recyclability even at temperatures lower than T-g. This phosphate diester-based mixed transesterification concept represents an efficient approach for developing multifunctional vitrimers and can also be generalized into other thermally cured polymer systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据