4.7 Article

The Node Vector Distance Problem in Complex Networks

期刊

ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3416509

关键词

Spreading events; social networks; network epidemics; structural change

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the Node Vector Distance (NVD) problem in complex networks and surveys algorithms capable of addressing it. NVD solutions have broader applications beyond computer vision, such as in economics, epidemiology, viral marketing, and sociology. The study showcases differences and similarities of various solution classes on synthetic and real world network data, providing a roadmap for computationally tractable solutions.
We describe a problem in complex networks we call the Node Vector Distance (NVD) problem, and we survey algorithms currently able to address it. Complex networks are a useful tool to map a non-trivial set of relationships among connected entities, or nodes. An agent-e.g., a disease-can occupy multiple nodes at the same time and can spread through the edges. The node vector distance problem is to estimate the distance traveled by the agent between two moments in time. This is closely related to the Optimal Transportation Problem (OTP), which has received attention in fields such as computer vision. OTP solutions can be used to solve the node vector distance problem, but they are not the only valid approaches. Here, we examine four classes of solutions, showing their differences and similarities both on synthetic networks and real world network data. The NVD problem has a much wider applicability than computer vision, being related to problems in economics, epidemiology, viral marketing, and sociology, to cite a few. We show how solutions to the NVD problem have a wide range of applications, and we provide a roadmap to general and computationally tractable solutions. We have implemented all methods presented in this article in a publicly available open source library, which can be used for result replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据