4.6 Editorial Material

Global Health Education in the Time of COVID-19: An Opportunity to Restructure Relationships and Address Supremacy

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 96, 期 6, 页码 795-797

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003911

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR001863] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global health education partnerships are evolving towards a focus on health equity, with LMIC institutions seeking more equitable experiences for their trainees. Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic highlight the value of bidirectional educational exchange and the need for restructuring these partnerships for the mutual benefit of all partners.
Global health and its predecessors, tropical medicine and international health, have historically been driven by the agendas of institutions in high-income countries (HICs), with power dynamics that have disadvantaged partner institutions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Since the 2000s, however, the academic global health community has been moving toward a focus on health equity and reexamining the dynamics of global health education (GHE) partnerships. Whereas GHE partnerships have largely focused on providing opportunities for learners from HIC institutions, LMIC institutions are now seeking more equitable experiences for their trainees. Additionally, lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic underscore already important lessons about the value of bidirectional educational exchange, as regions gain new insights from one another regarding strategies to impact health outcomes. Interruptions in experiential GHE programs due to COVID-19-related travel restrictions provide an opportunity to reflect on existing GHE systems, to consider the opportunities and dynamics of these partnerships, and to redesign these systems for the equitable benefit of the various partners. In this commentary, the authors offer recommendations for beginning this process of change, with an emphasis on restructuring GHE relationships and addressing supremacist attitudes at both the systemic and individual levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据