4.5 Review

Multivariable risk scores for predicting short-term outcomes for emergency department patients with unexplained syncope: A systematic review

期刊

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 502-510

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14203

关键词

syncope predictors; syncope risk scores; syncope risk stratification; syncope outcomes; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically reviewed the accuracy of multivariate risk stratification scores for identifying adult syncope patients at high and low risk of adverse events within 30 days, finding that the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) performed well in this regard. However, other risk scores lacked validation or sufficient accuracy.
Objectives Emergency department (ED) patients with unexplained syncope are at risk of experiencing an adverse event within 30 days. Our objective was to systematically review the accuracy of multivariate risk stratification scores for identifying adult syncope patients at high and low risk of an adverse event over the next 30 days. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and CINAHL) from database creation until May 2020. We sought studies evaluating prediction scores of adults presenting to an ED with syncope. We included studies that followed patients for up to 30 days to identify adverse events such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiac surgery. We only included studies with a blinded comparison between baseline clinical features and adverse events. We calculated likelihood ratios and confidence intervals (CIs). Results We screened 13,788 abstracts. We included 17 studies evaluating nine risk stratification scores on 24,234 patient visits, where 7.5% (95% CI = 5.3% to 10%) experienced an adverse event. A Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) of 4 or more was associated with a high likelihood of an adverse event (LRscore >= 4 = 11, 95% CI = 8.9 to 14). A CSRS of 0 or less (LRscore <= 0 = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.20) was associated with a low likelihood of an adverse event. Other risk scores were not validated on an independent sample, had low positive likelihood ratios for identifying patients at high risk, or had high negative likelihood ratios for identifying patients at low risk. Conclusion Many risk stratification scores are not validated or not sufficiently accurate for clinical use. The CSRS is an accurate validated prediction score for ED patients with unexplained syncope. Its impact on clinical decision making, admission rates, cost, or outcomes of care is not known.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据